We are Redshift Labs. We’re AI experts dedicated to redefining how businesses serve their customers. If you’re ready and excited for the 21st century, join us.

Markets are conversations

There’s something happening to software that most people haven’t noticed yet, but once you see it, you can’t unsee it. We’re reaching the end of interfaces as we know them.

I don’t mean interfaces are disappearing. I mean the fundamental relationship between humans and software is changing from transactional to conversational, from stateless to stateful, from tools to teammates.
— Greg Isenberg

We are finally coming out of the dull doldrums of humans searching by hand, filtering, reading, skimming, overlooking, running multiple tabs and searches, going too fast, making mistakes, taking wrong turns, making videos, shooting videos, dealing with forms, and waiting for humans to reply by email. We are in a new era of getting things done. That means eliminating the bottlenecks and gatekeepers and streamlining not just the flow of information but the flow of business and innovation.

We’re finally entering the era I described in my book, Pull, from 2010. You can buy it on Amazon today, and I highly recommend the hardcover version for the best reading experience, though I understand many people would prefer the Kindle version.

We’re doing it differently than I envisioned, but the goal is still the same: give customers the ability to pull products and services to them and focus on the outcome rather than the intermediary processes. Markets are conversations, not linear processes. The goals keep changing as society moves forward. Let’s dig in.

Websites are dinosaurs

In 1994, I invented websites. Before that, there were pages and links. I wrote the first book on web design, which remains to this day Amazon’s longest-running #1 bestseller and was translated into 17 languages. Today, there are around 1 billion websites, and they are all past their prime. Websites are expensive to maintain, difficult to navigate, usually out of date, and the source of many arguments inside of companies. Intranets are just as bad — it’s difficult to find anything, and people are rarely incentivized to share information maximally.

Today, many companies are doing a tremendous amount of repetitive work by hand. We are used to it. We accept it as part of our jobs. But AI can do all that, and we should keep remembering to use AI first, rather than do it ourselves.

There are degrees of repetitive work. Today, we use databases and mail-merge to send out thousands of customized emails, but we still cut and paste details from one document to another and spend a lot of time getting the details right.

Websites are a great example. Today, we use SquareSpace, WordPress, or Wix to build a website. The advantage is that the system can present a dynamic site to whoever is visiting, whether on a desktop, a tablet, or a phone. You’re reading a SquareSpace site right now. What a pain these platforms are! There are always compromises, workarounds, and “custom code” to get what you want. Ecosystems of consultants surround these platforms because they are so arcane and temperamental. They are barely a step up from hand-coding HTML.

As I was creating this page, I made some mistake and put all the sections into the footer rather than the body of the page. Half an hour later, I realized the problem and spent another half an hour cutting and pasting the sections out of the footer into the header by hand. How 2015 is that?

Apps are traps

I’ve been saying this for 25 years, even before mobile apps were a thing. Apps are not ecosystems, they are silos. Every company would love to have a lot of customers using its app, because it’s so hard to switch apps, establish an account, do KYC, and get set up properly. Once you do all that, it’s a barrier to switching vendors.

But.

Apps are expensive to maintain. If you have a website and a mobile app, you now have three platforms to keep up-to-date, not to mention social media, blogs, and other content. The more channels you have, the more IT people you need. Apps are notorious for using up a lot of engineering and maintenance. There are frequent OS updates, which require frequent responses on both IOS and Android. So the tech team grows and grows.

Plus, most customers don’t want an app for every vendor. They would rather have flexibility. They would rather have a personal data locker, but that doesn’t look like it’s going to happen. Think of it in a hierarchy:

  1. Website

  2. Tab open all the time

  3. App

It takes a lot to get a consumer to download and commit to an app. They may do it for their bank, but they are unlikely to do it for your mattress company or your coaching service.

If you want to do it all using a website, you’re again stuck with Wix, SquareSpace, and WordPress. This is the world of 2020, not the world of 2030.

The Company Software Stack

The rest of today’s tools are similar. Regardless of what business you’re in, your company’s software stack looks something like this:

  • Word and/or Google docs

  • Excel and/or Google sheets

  • Intranet (Sharepoint, Workvivo, Simpplr, Staffbase, etc.)

  • Communication (Slack, Zoom, Meet, Teams)

  • ERP software (Oracle, SAP, Microsoft, Sage, etc.)

  • Accounting (Xero, Quickbooks, Freshbooks, etc.)

  • CRM (Hubspot, SalesForce, Zoho, Pipedrive, etc.)

  • Customer support (Zendesk, Helpscout, Intercom, etc.)

  • Email (Hubspot, Mailchimp, Constant Contact, Brevo, etc.)

  • Web publishing (Wix, WordPress, SquareSpace, etc.)

  • Contracts (Word, DocuSign, legalese, contract databases, etc.)

All these systems are now desperately adding AI to their existing work models. Think about that. Not only do companies have a lot of vendors and interoperability issues, but now every system is going to be “smart” and try to impress customers with what it can do — in its own silo. How’s that going to work out?

Will companies now need fewer IT people or more?

How many clicks does it take to do something on your app or website?

How about no clicks?

In 2025, we are still mimicking the old paper/folder/filing-cabinet way of working, we’re just automating it. We’re still sending electronic invoices that look exactly like the old paper invoices to a group of people called “accounts payable” and getting an “electronic check” in return. We’re actually signing documents using fake signature fonts to make our documents look like they have been signed by a human on paper.

AI is now being used to assist salespeople in making the pitch, to assist students in doing the homework, to assist writers in writing the copy, to assist lawyers in managing the documents, to assist the accountants to make sure the accounting is done correctly, to assist the designer in using the software, to assist the architect in designing the building, and to assist the security team in looking for vulnerabilities.

This is not going to be the case for very long. In most cases, we don’t need to pitch, do homework, write copy, manage documents, etc. We want the end result, not an AI-assisted process. We need to think differently and let the customers pull products and services through our companies directly. That’s why I wrote my book. And now it is (finally) time to rethink business and get the end result rather than “digitize” and “automate” the old processes and pipelines.

Imagine an architect designing a home. The experience with AI is going to be more like conducting a symphony than using the tools directly. Speak in metaphors and make grand gestures. Talk about sunsets, colors, seasons, and the feeling of the sunlight coming into your bedroom in the morning. Reference other similar homes around the world. Let AI generate all kinds of options and choose the options you like, then keep trying and iterating and refining, sometimes trying something entirely new, most of the time narrowing down to, say, three finalists. Refine those three finalists using finger gestures, conversation, choosing from palettes, exploring options, turning, twisting, opening, closing, and refining.

Then present those three to the client. When you have your overall design and footprint, start detailing, engaging all systems: engineering, lighting, plumbing, entry/exit, security, temperature control, code compliance, all while watching the price estimate change in real-time, and the house or building begins to really take shape. No drawing. No floor plans. No tools. In this example, a house is the result of a conversation between the designer, the client, the AI system, and the contractors that build it. In effect, the client pulls the house through the system in real time during design and very quickly during the build phase.

AI is not a tool. It’s not a helper. It’s an employee. It’s an analyst, designer, salesperson, demographer, actuarial, marketing partner, HR person, project manager, event planner, even product manager. It doesn’t manage humans, but it can function as an employee for many companies. It may not get everything right, but neither do humans. One thing it will do is work hard and do the task over and over until you’re satisfied.

One of my favorite prompts is “You’re an analyst. Be one.”

Markets of one

We’ve been talking about this forever, and what we have now is “birds of a feather” — groups of customers who are similar. That’s because it’s too hard to treat everyone individually.

But AI can do that. AI can take as long as anyone needs to give that customer what she wants. The vast majority of your potential customers aren’t ready to buy yet. They need more information, they need more proof, they need more assurance, they need more time. Companies typically spend their effort on clients who are “ready to buy,” because that’s the best allocation of resources. But now companies can take each customer on her own personalized journey and give her all the attention she needs. For pennies.

Economic growth

Today, any country that grows its nominal GDP by 5 percent per year is growing quickly. Very few nations can do that. The big exception over the last 30 years has been China, but even they have slowed down. Most developing nations are working hard to catch up, but they are held back by lack of infrastructure, education, access to markets, governance, and much more.

Some experts say AI will give everyone a smart assistant to help them do their jobs. I don’t see it that way. I believe much more in the acceleration of economies.

If you have an assistant to help you write a book, then the AI does a lot of the research and much of the writing, and then you, the author, go over it and make sure it’s the book you want. You do the final edit, work with the AI to get all the quotes and charts you want, and then you send the book off to the printer. You’d do the same thing with a report or a business plan.

For the last 40 years, the US has experienced nominal GDP growth of around 5 percent per year.

But with AI you don’t need to write a book. You ask the question: “Is a book the right solution to my customer’s problem?” You ask: “What’s the end result my customer really wants?” Suppose your customer wants to learn behavioral economics. You can create an experience rather than a book. An interactive experience might be a course, blog posts, debates, conversations among experts, interviews, and a back-and-forth conversation with the author directly. A book is a one-size-fits-all solution that bores most of its readers, no matter how well written it is, because much of the time spent with a book is not time spent getting what you really want.

It’s better to think of the results people want before you give them a solution. They may want to build an airplane or buy a home or learn about Winston Churchill or study calculus or plan a safari. In that context, a book is hardly the right tool for the job. Even if you think of the great books that get used all the time as textbooks and “landmark” works, what if you had the author right there with you teaching you everything she knew and helping you get your result? The gorgeous writing, the layout, the illustrations — they mean nothing if you’re having a conversation with someone who can help you build an airplane, design an experiment, start a business, design a chair, diagnose your symptoms, or get you a job.

People often hire consultants or see doctors to get a certain outcome, but that process is dependent on finding the right person and getting the right advice. Different people will give different advice for the same problem or symptoms. Then, the customer or patient has to decide what’s right for her. What if she had the ability to get dozens of opinions, distill primary research and metastudies, try small experiments and see what happens, and take responsibility for her own outcomes? In the age of AI, you won’t trust a single doctor or consultant, you’ll want access to a range of opinions and suggestions, and you’ll get help with the process of making decisions using the appropriate decision framework. We will trust individuals less and trust AI more. AI will be biased rather than Neutral, but it will be biased less than most humans are.

(I’m looking forward to a company called Feynman that makes an unbiased, evidence-based, maximally truth-seeking LLM, but that company doesn’t exist yet.)

We need to think more about the end goals rather than the means. Our software is designed to fill the middle of that process, to help humans go through the steps from A to Z.

You can buy a bunch of books and use them to build a new software business. You’ll need books on creating your app, managing people, setting up marketing, getting initial customers, building your back office, hiring, pricing, distribution, etc. Or you can hire consultants and advisors. It’s a lot of knowledge, and it takes years to get it working correctly.

Or you can just conjure up a new software business using AI, ask AI to help you go to market, get first customers, and serve them. You can use your time talking with customers about what outcomes they really want and how the software can better meet their needs. In this scenario, everything is a conversation, and the business is a byproduct of those conversations.

Conjuring, not assisting
Stop using AI assistants and start waving your magic ward and conjuring. Conjure up a new kind of school. Conjure up a new way for people to file their taxes simply by having a converation and answering questions. Conjure up an event. Conjure a health and fitness plan that works for you. Conjure up an airplane that builds itself in the factory and flies itself to your hangar. Wave your magic wand and create things. Think of the end result, not the intermediate result.

Today, I conjured up a legal contract using two separate LLMS — one to draft the contract and the other to critique and make suggestions. I asked questions and kept the conversation going. After several back-and-forth passes, they both agree the contract was in plain english, clear, and legally valid. I didn’t write a word. This is what AI should do — it should do all the heavy lifting, under your guidance. It should not be a tool to help you create, it should be a machine that creates, and you design the machine.

I think if we do it right, within a few years, developed economies could easily see nominal GDP growth of 1 percent per month.

What about undeveloped economies? They will have access to world-class education and resources for pennies. They will be able to do much more with much less. We in the developed world will want their products and services. We will conjure up experiences they will be part of. There will be a lot of change, and not all of it will be beneficial, but I think for the next 30 years or so we’re going to see acceleration everywhere that will lift all boats.

That’s why we’re called Redshift labs. Because we see the benefit in accelerating the world economy. Jensen Huang says you don’t have to fire your best employees, you can just have new ideas to redeploy people to new challenges. With just a little training, they’ll be able to take on those challenges and serve customers in new and delightful ways.

Silicon Valley Girl made a video on how she automated most of her marketing and is now hiring more humans to grow her company faster.

This is the era of AI. This is the era of growth.

Join us

In 2017, I started an online community with a single web page that became the Pillar Project. The Pillar wallet is still in the app store and still has a community of crypto enthusiasts behind it. 

Now I'm starting an AI community to help others learn about AI and come up with new product and company ideas. I’m looking for people who are already into AI, see the possibilities, and realize that we’re at the starting line right now. It’s time to build solutions on top of LLMs and agents that delight customers and give them the end result without all the middlemen.

I’m looking for designers who want to conjure up new interfaces, new workflows, new ways of connecting buyers and sellers, new ways of getting the end result.

I’m looking for technologists and builders who want to conjure up the web apps that guide the LLMs to create solid solutions to move our customers forward.

I’m looking for product people who can translate the needs of a customer into a conjured-up solution. We don’t want to redesign TV remotes — we want to eliminate them. We don’t want to redesign education — we want to replace it with something better. We don’t want to build banks or insurance companies or tech support or doctors — we want to give customers the end result, not the clumsy “solutions” we have today.

I’m looking for investors to invest in projects and funds. If you’re an accredited or non-US investor, join us on the journey and learn alongside us.

We have a Slack community. We’re going to have Zoom calls, events, and put founders and technical people together. We hope to get companies funded. If you want to join, fill out the form below.